Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anastasia Gasanova vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gasanova vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Anastasia Gasanova vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gasanova 1 - 0 Loeb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gasanova has won 36.46% of points on their second serve, while Loeb has won 46.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gasanova, in recent form, has won 62.6% of their opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 54.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.18% and 38.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gasanova has saved 48.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 55.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gasanova has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 17/ 12), with Loeb winning 46.43% (W/L 26/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gasanova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 121/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Gasanova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gasanova winning 1 times and Loeb being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gasanova winning 2 and Loeb winning 0. The last match between Gasanova and Loeb was at the W60 Bronx, 17-08-2022, First, Hard with Anastasia Gasanova getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gasanova and Loeb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gasanova winning 0 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gasanova winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gasanova has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.86 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 283.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gasanova has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gasanova has converted 54.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 45.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
645
Rank
121
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
305
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
60% (242-159)
Career Total W/L
54% (295-248)
68% (13-6)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$78,873
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Anastasia Gasanova vs Jamie Loeb For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gasanova VS Loeb
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Anastasia Gasanova | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (39/53) | 53% (35/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (25/39) | 60% (21/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (6/14) | 26% (8/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (37/66) | 42% (22/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Jamie Loeb
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anastasia Gasanova | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (13/6) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (29/14) | 53% (38/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (231/172) | 52% (341/318) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 67% (8/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 88 |
| DFs per game | 0.82 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 162 | 118 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1:46:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 248.26 | 291.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (759/1217) | 55% (1151/2087) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (463/759) | 66% (763/1151) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 36% (167/458) | 47% (439/935) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (99/181) | 46% (115/252) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (634/1198) | 44% (954/2151) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (13/6) | 52% (15/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (13/19) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 14% (14/2) |
Anastasia Gasanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
52%
(
45 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Peangtarn Plipuech
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Meiqi Guo
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Xinxin Yao
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
10
50%
(
15 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Sohyun Park
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
4
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
11
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Gasanova Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gasanova are available here and Loeb photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
